Carbon 14 dating and the shroud of turin Chinese english adult chatroom
If somebody needs the whole article, let me know, I think I have it in spanish, but I can translate it.--FMateos (talk) , (UTC) Ok, please provide the article author, title, date and conference name. Also please provide a wikilink to the Spanish wiki article when it is ready. History2007 (talk) , (UTC) There are a lot of comments in this article which are not referenced.
They tend to be the more contentious statements, and almost all of them are casting unsubstantiated doubt on the validity of the C14 process and on the integrity of the people concerned.
No attempt has been made to add references, although they were tagged a while back already.
Should these non-referenced statements be removed now, in terms of WP: Policy?
JTansut (talk) , 11 January 2011 (UTC) I have not looked into this issue, so can not comment, but if you want to be sure, leave a message for user: Thucyd who knows a lot about the topic and discuss it. But I can tell you that currently there is a huge discussion between all scientists around a peer-reviewed article published by Timothy Jull in december in Radiocarbon, his own journal (University of Arizona).
History2007 (talk) , 11 January 2011 (UTC) Hello JTansut and History. Jull claimed that he kept in secrecy in 1988 a unknown sample and that he cannot confirm Rogers' findings (Thermochimica Acta, 2005).
Possibly misinterpreted by original author of this section?This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia.This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia.(See one source.) I did the calculation in 1999, and got a result of 1.8, or 180%, much closer to Mc Crone's result than that cited by Jull.I suggest the article be updated to reflect these conflicting claims.
This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia.